Method: 28 elementary students, in first through third grade, were asked to conduct an assessment of their peers’ performance of two skill components (i.e., ‘side to target’ and ‘step with opposite foot’) during an overhand throwing task. Students were placed in pairs; the first participant performed five trials of the task while the partner assessed each trial. After five trials, the partners switched roles so that each participant had the opportunity to complete the throwing task as well as the assessment. Sessions were conducted once a week for a total of 4 weeks. All trials were video recorded; videos were later viewed by the researchers who conducted an assessment of each trial to be used as the criterion for comparison. The participants’ assessments were then compared to the researchers’ and evaluated for accuracy.
Analysis/Results: A one-way ANOVA revealed no significant difference in participants’ assessment accuracy across weeks (F(3,142) = 0.392, p = .759), indicating the participants’ accuracy did not change over time. There were, however, significant differences between grades overall (F(2,143) = 9.182, p < .001). Post-hoc analyses showed these differences were between 3rd (M = 91.77 %, SD = 13.97) and 1st (M = 78.95, SD = 22.76) grades (p = .005), and between 3rd and 2nd (M = 77.17, SD = 22.28) grades (p < .001).
Conclusions: Despite older students performing the assessment significantly better than their younger counterparts, results still indicated that students as young as first grade can still perform a peer process assessment with a relatively high degree of accuracy (i.e., nearly 80% accurate). These results indicate that physical education teachers may be able to implement peer process assessments with lower elementary students with the assumption that they will be completed accurately.